| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
1. The purpose of alliances - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Just as you yourself stated, alliances exist to let corporation keep their indentity and at the same time create a larger group of ppl working for a common goal. You speak of buyouts, mergers are in all effect the same thing most of the time. It b...
- by Mika Meisk - at 2008.02.20 12:29:00
|
2. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Very nice response, omen was in need of a fitting boost before the turret, somehow giving it an extra turret actually decreased the need for a fitting boost (addinf more variability). However omen could use some cpu. Grid on zealot is fine, migh...
- by Mika Meisk - at 2008.02.05 21:08:00
|
3. bounty system overhaul - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Mika Meisk on 04/02/2008 15:25:06 Whats to stop someone with a bounty from simply taking the contract with an alt, pod = profit? Isnt that the main problem with the current system? //Mika
- by Mika Meisk - at 2008.02.04 15:25:00
|
4. PVE Shard - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
A pve shard seems both redundant and bad. The mitigating factor that eve pve has is that in all aspects of the game you compete with other players. Further you the risk vs. reward which would be eliminated both by pvp-flags and a shard. Eve is fu...
- by Mika Meisk - at 2008.02.04 15:14:00
|
5. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
LOVE the changes, feels like the deimos change is a bit comedic though. These changes are so good that i seriously now no longer care about the cap problems, nor the maller/proph/punisher. Only ship that seems to still be a bit in the cold is the ...
- by Mika Meisk - at 2008.02.02 15:51:00
|
6. Zulupark Good Man - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Aye the pilgrim changes might be hingent on the promised re-evaluation f the amarr ewar though. //Mika
- by Mika Meisk - at 2008.02.01 21:39:00
|
7. Zulupark Good Man - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
eagle extra turret iirc //Mika
- by Mika Meisk - at 2008.02.01 21:17:00
|
8. Bonus changed to Apoc and 5th turret for Omen ,Zealot - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Mika Meisk on 01/02/2008 21:01:46 These changes makes me wet in my pants. Awesome, hopefully they wont get whine nerfed into oblivion before they hit tq :) //Mika
- by Mika Meisk - at 2008.02.01 20:59:00
|
9. Some love for the Amarr, new Dev Blog by Zulupark - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
A question as well: Have you a design goal for amarr, as you stated they are supposed to gank and tank. For battleships this methodology is actually rather ok. The slow lumbering beasts combined with large optimal range offsets the capuse and t...
- by Mika Meisk - at 2008.01.30 17:43:00
|
10. Some love for the Amarr, new Dev Blog by Zulupark - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Nice too see that you have reached the tinkering stage. I don't really get why you decreased the explosive resistance on the zealots armor though? This is nice and all and its good you take small steps. But you will take a closer look at the t1 c...
- by Mika Meisk - at 2008.01.30 17:35:00
|
11. Server issues - Proxy gone - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
:( gief server, thx for the info though. //Mika
- by Mika Meisk - at 2007.12.20 10:44:00
|
12. BBC: negative reporting of Eve, but positive report on Second Life - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I'd hazard a guess that the analogy between escapism and unforfilling RL is stretched at the best. From my personal experience my friends from engineering schools tends to be more gaming friendly than ppl that I know who works/studies in less tech...
- by Mika Meisk - at 2007.12.15 01:20:00
|
13. SISI patch still incompatible? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Mika Meisk on 12/12/2007 13:59:45 Edited by: Mika Meisk on 12/12/2007 13:57:23 Aye doesnt seem like the classic patch is downloadable yet. But afaik sisi is still down so you should be able to dl it soon enough. No use in patchi...
- by Mika Meisk - at 2007.12.12 13:56:00
|
14. SISI patch still incompatible? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
http://ccp.vo.llnwd.net/o2/test/evepremiumpatch45589-45639_test.exe This should work, just downloaded it but says status unknown atm. //Mika
- by Mika Meisk - at 2007.12.12 13:26:00
|
15. How to connect to Singularity - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
evepremiumpatch45589-45639_test.exe I downloaded this, but it says server status unknown, so im guessing their patching it up. //Mika
- by Mika Meisk - at 2007.12.12 13:24:00
|
16. Empire players moving to low-sec: a new proposal - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Quote: If it didn' Quote: null t need a better system, we'd have more players out in lowsec. I didn't say that there was a perfect system in place, I merely stated that personally I don't think the risk aspect is where foucs shoul...
- by Mika Meisk - at 2007.12.04 16:54:00
|
17. Empire players moving to low-sec: a new proposal - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
In my lowsec experience it's the rewards that are askew, not the risk. You rarely loose ships in lowsec if you take some very basic precautions. The idea of self policeing is allready beeing done in several lowsec areas and has been done by corps/...
- by Mika Meisk - at 2007.12.04 15:15:00
|
18. CCP, Where are you going wiith all of these changes? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Just as a complimentary suggestion, its about amarr . Are you looking into the different roles as they are beeing used in actual pvp? IE when does a gang benefit obviously more if bringing amarr ships than other-racial substitutes. This question...
- by Mika Meisk - at 2007.11.09 01:16:00
|
19. Dear Devs, - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
/Signed
- by Mika Meisk - at 2007.10.30 13:38:00
|
20. Amarrian Problems... Are they real? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
I agree. That covers mostly my position. The geddon can be usefull cause optimal is actually useful with a bs. The only time when optimal actually matters with regards to not dictating range. Thats why I previously said increase optimal on pulse, ...
- by Mika Meisk - at 2007.09.26 21:24:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |